|
Strengths
|
Objective
|
- Provides accurate measurement
- Research is replicable - results should be repeatable if same participants and same
procedures used
- Results reliable and generalisable
|
|
|
Generates theories
|
- Theories lead to hypotheses
- Theories stand or fall on supporting or refuting empirical evidence
- Psychology’s progress as a scientific discipline depends on developing better and
stronger theories
|
|
|
‘Real life’ applications
|
- Mental health - eg: assessing different forms of Psychotherapy and stress management
- Criminological Psychology - eg: offender profiling, assessing the soundness of witness
evidence
|
|
Weaknesses
|
People as machines
|
- Deterministic - people are predictable and controllable - cause and effect - and
reducible to laws and regularities of behaviour - according to Nick Heather (1976),
people are viewed as inert and passive until propelled into action by some internal
or external force
- Reductionist - complex behaviour can be reduced to basic, simple, component parts
- in contrast to the holistic view propounded by Humanistic psychologists
|
|
|
Research methods artificial
|
- Empirical methods of enquiry create artificial situations to control extraneous variables
- According to J Deese (1972), the very act of the researchers determining which variables
are important reduces objectivity
- Vulnerable to experimenter bias and demand characteristics
- Lack of ecological validity makes generalising findings to large groups of people
or whole populations questionable
|
|
|
Ethical issues in research
|
|
Are the goals of science even appropriate for Psychology? The Anti-Psychiatry psychiatrist
R D Laing (1965), in discussing the causes of Schizophrenia, felt it inappropriate
to view a person experiencing distress as a complex physical-chemical system that
has gone wrong.
Given that psychological methods (the so-called ‘talking therapies’) to treat serious
mental illness - such as Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder - have been only partially
successful, it could be argued that Laing had a point about applying scientific methods
to psychological problems!