
Cognitive-
CBT treatments have received empirical support for efficient treatment of a variety
of clinical and non-
CBT was primarily developed through a merging of behavioural therapies with cognitive
therapies. While rooted in rather different theories, these two approaches found
common ground in focusing on the here-
How CBT works...
CBT includes a variety of approaches and therapeutic systems, having effectively absorbed Aaron Beck’s Cognitive Therapy and led Albert Ellis to reformat Rational Emotive Therapy as Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. Defining the scope of what constitutes a cognitive–behavioural therapy is a difficulty that has persisted throughout its development. American psychologists Keith Dobson & David Dozois define cognitive–behavioural therapies as sharing the theoretical assumption that behavioural change is mediated by cognitive events.
The particular therapeutic techniques vary within the different approaches of CBT according to the particular kind of problem issues, but commonly may include keeping a diary of significant events and associated feelings, thoughts and behaviours; questioning and testing cognitions, assumptions, evaluations and beliefs that might be unhelpful and unrealistic; gradually facing activities which may have been avoided; and trying out new ways of behaving and reacting. Relaxation, mindfulness and distraction techniques are also commonly included. CBT is often also used in conjunction with mood stabilising medications to treat conditions like Bipolar Disorder. Its application in treating Schizophrenia along with medication and Family Therapy is recognised by NICE.
CBT interventions are structured with clear goals and measurable outcomes.
The Cognitive element
The therapist encourages the client to become aware of beliefs which might contribute to anxiety or Depression or are associated with a general dysfunction in daily life. This can involve direct questioning such as: “Tell me what you think about....”
The therapist does not usually challenge the beliefs outrightly but treats them as
hypotheses to be tested for validity. Therapist and client may also work together
to conduct a cost-
The Behavioural element
Therapist and client decide together how to test out hypotheses through experimentation. Experiments can be conducted through role play or homework assignments. The intention is that, by actively testing out possibilities, clients themselves come to recognise the consequences of their faulty cognitions.
Therapist and client then work together to set new goals for the client in order that more realistic and rational beliefs are incorporated into ways of thinking.
These are usually in graded stages of difficulty so that clients can build upon their own success.
Going through CBT generally is not an overnight process for clients. Even after clients
have learned to recognise when and where their mental processes go awry, in some
cases it can take considerable time of effort to replace a dysfunctional cognitive-
For Depression
According to the British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive-
Evaluating CBT
For Depression
In a study by Giovanni Fava, Chiara Rafanelli, Silvana Grandi, Sandra Conti & Piera
Belluardo (1998) 40 patients with recurrent Depression were allocated to one of two
groups. In the first they received drug treatment alone; in the second they received
drugs and CBT. The second group showed a greater reduction in symptoms. In a follow-
Probably the most significant investigation into the efficacy of CBT in treating
Depression was that of Andrew Butler, Jason Chapman, Evan Forman & Aaron T Beck (2006)
who reviewed 16 meta-
Not all investigators have endorsed CBT. J Holmes (2002) identified several limitations
in the evidence:-
It should be noted that CBT does not benefit all patients.
NICE (2004) recommended Psychodynamic therapies and medication for more complex cases of Depression. CBT is recommended for mild to moderate Depression.
General
There may be bias in some of the reports on the effectiveness of CBT. Richard Harrington,
Fiona Campbell, Philip Shoebridge & Jane Whittaker (1998) have questioned why several
reviews of studies of CBT have failed to mention studies in which CBT was found not
to be effective. Additionally, Bruce Wampold, Takuya Minami, Thomas Baskin & Sandy
Tierney (2002) re-
It also appears that, in some cases, other forms of therapy can be more effective.
Christer Sandahl, Kristina Herlitz & Goran Ahlin (1998) reported that, at 15-
CBT appeals to clients who find ‘insight therapies’ (which delve into inner emotional
conflicts) too threatening. Although CBT can be subject to the criticism that it
does not address the underlying causes, it does attempt to empower clients by educating
them into self-