Blame biology, not parenting, new theory suggests
by
Ellen Ruppel Shell
Anorexia, the most lethal of psychiatric disorders, afflicts as many as 1 percent
of young women and about a tenth as many men, and casts a Svengalian spell, leading
its victims to willingly starve themselves in the midst of plenty. Now, psychologist
Shan Guisinger has developed a radical new view of Anorexia that she says explains
both the bizarre features of the illness - self starvation and hyperactivity - and
its resistance to treatment by traditional Psychotherapy.
Anorexia, she contends, is not primarily a psychological condition brought on by
a troubled childhood - as is often thought - but a disorder based in biology, specifically
in the appetite regulation mechanism in the brain. Her theory postulates that anorexics
have a biological adaptation to weight loss that causes their bodies to shut off
hunger signals, and to ratchet up physical activity, even as their flesh melts away.
"Anorexics are often told to stop dieting, to listen to their body and to give it
what it wants," Guisinger said. "But the reality is that they are listening to their
bodies, and their bodies are telling them not to eat. The truth is, they have to
stop listening."
Guisinger, who has treated eating disorders in private practice in Missoula, Montana,
for nearly two decades, trained in Evolutionary Biology in the late 1970's before
getting a doctorate in clinical psychology at the University of California at Berkeley.
This background, coupled with her upbringing on a farm in Washington state, convinced
her that Freudian and other purely psychological explanations for Anorexia were inadequate.
"We sometimes forget that humans are animals first," she said, describing her theory,
which she published this fall in the prestigious Journal of Psychological Review.
"And a number of animals are able to turn off hunger when they have something better
to do." Gray whales, for example, won't eat while they're migrating, even if food
is plentiful. Laboratory rats starved down to 70 percent of their body weight stop
eating and become hyperactive, spinning up to 12 miles a day on their tiny exercise
wheels.
Guisinger's 'Adapted to Flee Hypothesis' traces the roots of human Anorexia back
more than 11,000 years to the late Pleistocene era, when nomadic foragers migrated
around the globe. At that time, the biological capacity to suppress hunger and move
quickly and tirelessly in search of food may have offered an adaptive advantage,
just as it appears to offer an advantage to migrating animals.
"Today, genetically susceptible people who lose a good deal of weight may trigger
this archaic adaptation," she said. "And that's what underlies their illness."
Critics scoff that a potentially fatal disorder that suppresses fertility in women
is hardly adaptive. But Guisinger does not argue that Anorexia per se helps an individual
survive and reproduce in the modern world. Rather she says that anorexics suffer
from a toxic distortion of the innate mechanisms that kept our ancient ancestors
alive.
Daniel le Grange, director of an eating disorders program at the University of Chicago
says Guisinger's idea has "a ring of truth about it, because those who survived [in
ancient times] must have had a gene to allow them to starve well." Indeed, the very
intractability of Anorexia suggests that it had some adaptive function in human evolution:
Being wired into the brain through eons of history, it is far less likely than learned
behaviors to respond favorably to traditional Psychotherapy.
Walter Kaye, a psychiatrist and professor of Psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh
says the physiological component of the illness is extremely powerful.
"Anorexia is a very homogeneous disorder," he said. "People who have it have about
the same symptoms. They also tend to say the same things, act the same way. When
you see that kind of pattern, it says biological."
Numerous scientific studies show that weight loss from any cause - be it dieting,
Depression, or even surgery or physical illness -- can initiate the anorexic cycle
in the genetically inclined. Nearly half its victims struggle with the disease throughout
their lives.
Cynthia Bulik, a professor of Psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill who has studied Anorexia since the mid-1980s, said that while important, psychological
treatments for the disorder fail if they don't first address the physiological aspects.
She points out that anorexics, like all starving people, tend to be unreliable witnesses
of their own experience.
"You can't do deep Psychotherapy with someone whose brain is not working," she said.
Anorexics have chronically high levels of cholecystokinin, serotonin, and dopamine,
chemicals that signal satiety in the brain. They also have low levels of appetite
promoters, such as galanin and norepinephrine. Hence their brains are chronically
lying about the body's need for food, or at best passing on a distorted view.
The National Institutes of Health is sponsoring a study to uncover the genetic variance
underlying this neurochemical deception. The goal is both to predict who among us
has the potential to become anorexic, and to sort out subsets of anorexics who may
respond to various treatments.
Bernard Devlin, a statistical geneticist and professor of Psychiatry at the University
of Pittsburgh is, along with Kaye, one of the principal investigators in the NIH
study. Part of his effort involves looking for the genes that make anorexics vulnerable
to environmental triggers. "We have found some genomic regions that we believe are
associated with behaviors that predict Anorexia, and we're hoping to eventually narrow
it down to specific genes, or combinations of genes," Devlin said.
Such insights offer support for a family-centered approach to treating adolescent
Anorexia that enlists parents to help make eating non-negotiable, as they would taking
life-saving medicine. It's a time-consuming method, but one that can help break the
cycle of blame, guilt, denial, and self loathing underlying the illness and contributing
to its lethality.
Psychologist le Grange, who first encountered this family-based therapy at the Maudsley
Hospital in London over a decade ago, says that a recent study concluded that most
patients treated with this approach regained health, and remained healthy five years
after treatment. Feeding the disease, le Grange said, often reveals that family psychopathology
is a symptom rather than a cause of the disorder.
Guisinger is an enthusiastic supporter of the Maudsley approach, which her theory
rationalizes, and she is hopeful that a wider acceptance of her theory will lead
to other effective treatments, as well as encourage patients and their families to
seek professional help early, when it is most likely to be effective.
"Understanding the symptoms of anorexia as an archaic biological adaptation can free
psychotherapists, physicians, and parents from unjustified blaming," she said. "And
that in itself is a big step toward curbing this devastating disease."
- The Boston
Globe 30/12/03
Copyright © 2003 NY Times Co