Share on Delicious
Share on Digg
Share on Facebook
Share on Stumble Upon
Share on Twitter
Share on Google Bookmarks

If you have enjoyed these pages or found them useful, you may like to donate. Even the smallest donation helps with the site’s running costs.

The 7th Code

by
Don Beck, October 2006



Spiral Dynamics co-developer Don Beck is occasionally prone to post what effectively amount to teach-ins or mini-lectures on the Spiral Dynamics e-lists. This is an extract from one such posting in October 2006.You can e-mail Don or visit the Spiral Dynamics Integral web site to find out more about his work.



Clearly, the contours of YELLOW (G-T/Systemic/Authentic) have not been etched in tin much less set in concrete. But, with all due respect to other developmental models, this highlights the uniqueness of the Gravesian/SDi perspective in that it does address, with great specificity, how each new vMEMETIC code actually appears; what are the Life Conditions that spark and drive it; and how Life Problems ‘G’ will awaken the capacities (T) to deal with new realities, new challenges, and new threats as well. What provides the totem pole for development is, in our view, the accumulation of the vMEMETIC codes or schemes (with the multiple expressions of content or themes) that form societal stacks that maintain all of the awakened codes and set the stage for new ones in the future. This is what we call The Double Helix; namely the interaction between Life Conditions experienced and the complex adaptive, contextual intelligences - micro, meso, and macro - that rise in human thinking and priority setting experiences. (This also explains why we put the amazing Spiral right in the vortex of Ken Wilber's 4 Quadrants (1995) as the regulating intelligence that governs the relative strength, density, ordering, and relevance of the emerging ‘levels’ and ‘lines’.) This provides the verb, the dynamic element, and the intelligence within the spine or core of the Spiral itself. (Actually, Spiral Dynamics is about the master code rather than the specific manifestations of the master code over time and in conceptual space. Too often many simply reduce the complex model to specific levels and miss entirely the essence of the point of view.

The Gravesian
bio-psycho-social model argues that mind and brain cannot be separated, that activity in the Upper Right impacts development in the Upper Left and vice versa; otherwise, how can the approach be truly integral? Years ago, while a fledging PhD student at the University of Oklahoma we were discounting the artificial polarities between thinking and feeling, thoughts and emotions, and even psychology and biology. Muzafer Sherif was one of the founding principals of the field of Social Psychology so our focus, then, was on cognitive structures and domains, that integrated person and group dynamics. You may recall he was the originator of the famous autokinetic light experiment (1935) as well as the celebrated Robbers' Cave intragroup and intergroup conflict reduction framework (with Harvey, White, Hood & Carolyn Wood Sherif, 1961)

.
This, then, becomes the context for what G-T/YELLOW will be, at least within the Gravesian/SDi and
2nd Tier concept and language. There are, of course, other points of view as to how/why/when ‘value systems’ appear -- in what arrangement, mesh, sequence, and ‘developmental’ stacking - but I would caution against expropriating Graves/SDi language and symbols to fill in holes in other models. Better to keep each theoretical package and stream unique and separate otherwise one is confusing apples with oranges and is corrupting the essential purity and seamlessness of elegant models. I decided some time ago to stay with the Gravesian perspective while respecting the invisible Spiral and honouring all of the systemic models. I also find it is much easier to work with practical people in reality settings by framing issues within the systemics of an internally logical set of definitions and perceptions of the critical variables.

We are being overwhelmed at the number of people who are reporting their experiences in the GREEN-to-YELLOW dance. All of these reports are actually making history as Life Conditions are driving the passages through a vast array of feelings, textures, hues, and quests. In short, the YELLOW textbook is now being written by individuals who have been struggling with their own experiences and sharing some with us fellow Gravesians. It always helps, however, to focus on what the conditions are, internal and external, that are being confronted, and how they are different from both Life Conditions ‘F’ - producing GREEN (S) - and Life Conditions ‘H’ - producing TURQUOISE (U).

These ideas might help.

First, it is important to avoid the linear trap; that is, the tendency to think as climbing a ladder where one leaves one step totally before moving to the next. Since these codes are more like complex chords than individual notes, one always has blends and admixtures. Further, ‘density’ development is as important as vertical up-shifts. The entire Spiral is within us as opposed to our being on the Spiral. In our work within organizations we always, for example, look for the dominant warm colour (RED, ORANGE or YELLOW) and dominant cool colour (PURPLE, BLUE, GREEN or TURQUOISE) rather than search for a single defining colour. This means our YELLOW will have other colours within it, with diverse manifestations of density and ego-involvement and, of course, with many, many different expressions of each (Content). YELLOW with strong BLUE as a subset will be different from YELLOW with a powerful ORANGE as an alloy. The pressing need in ‘G’ is to find new ways to connect entities beyond, but often including, both top-down, hierarchical models or expansive egalitarian arrangements. This capacity to connect the dots does require a motherboard on which the dots can be connected; the nature of the glue that binds them together; and the intelligence to moderate the flow of energy and resources among them.

Second, I believe a general feeling of loneliness is generated by the transition from the warmth and humanness of collective GREEN into the first display of individuality (existentialism) within the 7th Code. One is literally alone with few comrades or mates. This entails being outside the dominant culture(s) for sure, and often is separated from both the internal motives that drive meaning and purpose as well as the external arrangement of teams and associations around common cause. I believe stage two in the development of YELLOW reacquaints one with the earlier codes where one can bond with them once again but without attachments or obsessiveness that characterized the
1st Tier expressions. One can literally relish trips through PURPLE, RED, BLUE, ORANGE and GREEN zones which provide variety and richness in the human experience. I have spoken of the ‘vMEME Gym’ concept and suggested that we find places and experiences where we can exercise all of the 1st Tier codes.

Third, and I really sensed this when I attended the first European SDi Confab in the Netherlands in September 2006.
Peter Merry and others in his expanding constellation are actually creating the models of individual collectivism -- in an imaginative fashion. You can read about it at the Center for Human Emergence website.

Just as the critical difference between RED and ORANGE is reflected in the discipline within BLUE, and the element that differentiates BLUE from GREEN is in the autonomous self within ORANGE, GREEN can only transform into TURQUOISE through the verticality, practicality, and stuff-that-works qualities within YELLOW. Beware of the large number of ‘GREEN’ organizations, think tanks, movements, and alliances who are claiming that they have the codes to untangle the global knot. Simply changing names or dressing up websites and PowerPoint presentations won't get it done. I know this does not make me popular to say this but I gave up on that goal some time ago.

Finally, the book
Spiral Dynamics contains a number of the descriptors of the 7th Code, primarily from the original writing of Clare W Graves. I suspect, for many of us, we will sense a shift from a human-centric to a systems-centric perspective. We will seek to improve the human condition through the design of natural systems and arrangements which, as they unfold, will address many human problems in a much more effective manner than the F-S world view. We will discover a higher level of caring than what is expressed in GREEN. We will develop more of a pragmatic versus idealistic approach. We will accept that attempts to push the river will only result in frustration and often resistance to what we are trying to accomplish. We will work with Life Conditions, with the structure and texture of vMEMETIC Codes, and, in addition, with the content the code has permeated and impacted. And, we will accept that life itself is full of paradoxes, mystery, wonderment, sudden surprises, with peaks and valleys of emotions and feelings. Life becomes a journey; not a destination. And, we develop a deep respect and acceptance of the nature of ebb and flow as we experience life and all that it involves.

We will do the change that the world needs done.